0.07/0.12 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.12/0.18 % Command : eprover-ho %s --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --free-numbers -auto-schedule -p --cpu-limit=%d --neg-ext=all --pos-ext=all --ext-sup-max-depth=2 --schedule-kind=CASC 0.17/0.39 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu 0.17/0.39 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.17/0.39 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.17/0.39 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.17/0.39 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.17/0.39 % CPULimit : 1200 0.17/0.39 % WCLimit : 120 0.17/0.39 % DateTime : Tue Jul 13 13:18:33 EDT 2021 0.17/0.39 % CPUTime : 0.17/0.39 % Number of cores: 8 0.17/0.39 % Python version: Python 3.6.8 0.17/0.39 # Version: 2.6rc1-ho 0.17/0.42 # No SInE strategy applied 0.17/0.42 # Trying AutoSched0 for 59 seconds 12.25/12.49 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y 12.25/12.49 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred. 12.25/12.49 # 12.25/12.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.273 s 12.25/12.49 12.25/12.49 # Proof found! 12.25/12.49 # SZS status Theorem 12.25/12.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 12.25/12.49 thf(def_d_not, axiom, (d_not)=(^[X36:$o]:(X36=>~$true)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_d_not)). 12.25/12.49 thf(def_imp, axiom, (imp)=(^[X34:$o, X35:$o]:(X34=>X35)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_imp)). 12.25/12.49 thf(def_all_of, axiom, (all_of)=(^[X3:$i > $o, X2:$i > $o]:![X4:$i]:(X3 @ X4=>X2 @ X4)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_all_of)). 12.25/12.49 thf(def_is_of, axiom, (is_of)=(^[X1:$i, X2:$i > $o]:X2 @ X1), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_is_of)). 12.25/12.49 thf(def_non, axiom, (non)=(^[X1:$i, X2:$i > $o, X4:$i]:(X2 @ X4=>~$true)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_non)). 12.25/12.49 thf(def_l_some, axiom, (l_some)=(^[X1:$i, X2:$i > $o]:(![X821:$i]:(in @ X821 @ X1=>(X2 @ X821=>~$true))=>~$true)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_l_some)). 12.25/12.49 thf(def_n_is, axiom, (n_is)=(^[X897:$i, X898:$i]:(X897)=(X898)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_n_is)). 12.25/12.49 thf(def_e_is, axiom, (e_is)=(^[X1:$i, X60:$i, X61:$i]:(X60)=(X61)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_e_is)). 12.25/12.49 thf(def_ecp, axiom, (ecp)=(^[X1:$i, X93:$i > $i > $o, X4:$i, X10:$i]:(X4)=(ecelt @ X1 @ X93 @ X10)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_ecp)). 12.25/12.49 thf(def_l_ec, axiom, (l_ec)=(^[X38:$o, X39:$o]:(X38=>(X39=>~$true))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_l_ec)). 12.25/12.49 thf(def_n_some, axiom, (n_some)=(^[X899:$i > $o]:(![X900:$i]:(in @ X900 @ nat=>(X899 @ X900=>~$true))=>~$true)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_n_some)). 12.25/12.49 thf(def_diffprop, axiom, (diffprop)=(^[X1:$i, X183:$i, X4:$i]:(X1)=(n_pl @ X183 @ X4)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^1.ax', def_diffprop)). 12.25/12.49 thf(def_anec, axiom, (anec)=(^[X1:$i, X94:$i > $i > $o, X4:$i]:(![X860:$i]:(in @ X860 @ X1=>((X4)=(ecelt @ X1 @ X94 @ X860)=>~$true))=>~$true)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_anec)). 12.25/12.49 thf(def_d_and, axiom, (d_and)=(^[X40:$o, X41:$o]:((X40=>(X41=>~$true))=>~$true)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_d_and)). 12.25/12.49 thf(def_d_29_ii, axiom, (d_29_ii)=(^[X1:$i, X184:$i]:(![X921:$i]:(in @ X921 @ nat=>((X1)=(n_pl @ X184 @ X921)=>~$true))=>~$true)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^1.ax', def_d_29_ii)). 12.25/12.49 thf(def_iii, axiom, (iii)=(^[X1:$i, X185:$i]:(![X924:$i]:(in @ X924 @ nat=>((X185)=(n_pl @ X1 @ X924)=>~$true))=>~$true)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^1.ax', def_iii)). 12.25/12.49 thf(setof_p, axiom, ![X1:$i, X2:$i > $o]:is_of @ (d_Sep @ X1 @ X2) @ (^[X4:$i]:in @ X4 @ (power @ X1)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', setof_p)). 12.25/12.49 thf(def_ect, axiom, (ect)=(^[X1:$i, X95:$i > $i > $o]:d_Sep @ (power @ X1) @ (anec @ X1 @ X95)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_ect)). 12.25/12.49 thf(def_and3, axiom, (and3)=(^[X51:$o, X52:$o, X53:$o]:((X51=>(((X52=>(X53=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_and3)). 12.25/12.49 thf(def_moref, axiom, (moref)=(^[X1:$i, X219:$i]:(![X948:$i]:(in @ X948 @ nat=>((n_ts @ (num @ X1) @ (den @ X219))=(n_pl @ (n_ts @ (num @ X219) @ (den @ X1)) @ X948)=>~$true))=>~$true)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^1.ax', def_moref)). 12.25/12.49 thf(def_inf, axiom, (inf)=(in), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', def_inf)). 12.25/12.49 thf(def_esti, axiom, (esti)=(^[X1:$i]:in), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_esti)). 12.25/12.49 thf(def_lessf, axiom, (lessf)=(^[X1:$i, X220:$i]:(![X949:$i]:(in @ X949 @ nat=>((n_ts @ (num @ X220) @ (den @ X1))=(n_pl @ (n_ts @ (num @ X1) @ (den @ X220)) @ X949)=>~$true))=>~$true)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^1.ax', def_lessf)). 12.25/12.49 thf(def_n_eq, axiom, (n_eq)=(^[X1:$i, X218:$i]:(n_ts @ (num @ X1) @ (den @ X218))=(n_ts @ (num @ X218) @ (den @ X1))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^1.ax', def_n_eq)). 12.25/12.49 thf(def_l_or, axiom, (l_or)=(^[X42:$o, X816:$o]:((X42=>~$true)=>X816)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_l_or)). 12.25/12.49 thf(def_rt_is, axiom, (rt_is)=(^[X952:$i, X953:$i]:(X952)=(X953)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', def_rt_is)). 12.25/12.49 thf(def_rt_more, axiom, (rt_more)=(^[X1:$i, X646:$i]:(![X975:$i]:(in @ X975 @ frac=>((![X979:$i]:(in @ X979 @ frac=>(((in @ X975 @ (class @ X1)=>(((in @ X979 @ (class @ X646)=>((![X980:$i]:(in @ X980 @ nat=>((n_ts @ (num @ X975) @ (den @ X979))=(n_pl @ (n_ts @ (num @ X979) @ (den @ X975)) @ X980)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', def_rt_more)). 12.25/12.49 thf(def_rt_less, axiom, (rt_less)=(^[X1:$i, X648:$i]:(![X987:$i]:(in @ X987 @ frac=>((![X991:$i]:(in @ X991 @ frac=>(((in @ X987 @ (class @ X1)=>(((in @ X991 @ (class @ X648)=>((![X992:$i]:(in @ X992 @ nat=>((n_ts @ (num @ X991) @ (den @ X987))=(n_pl @ (n_ts @ (num @ X987) @ (den @ X991)) @ X992)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', def_rt_less)). 12.25/12.49 thf(k_PowerE, axiom, ![X1:$i, X146:$i]:(d_Subq @ X146 @ X1<=in @ X146 @ (power @ X1)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', k_PowerE)). 12.25/12.49 thf(def_d_Subq, axiom, (d_Subq)=(^[X1:$i, X5:$i]:![X4:$i]:(in @ X4 @ X1=>in @ X4 @ X5)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_d_Subq)). 12.25/12.49 thf(def_rat, axiom, (rat)=(ect @ frac @ n_eq), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', def_rat)). 12.25/12.49 thf(def_rt_moreis, axiom, (rt_moreis)=(^[X1:$i, X650:$i]:(((![X994:$i]:(in @ X994 @ frac=>((![X995:$i]:(in @ X995 @ frac=>(((in @ X994 @ (class @ X1)=>(((in @ X995 @ (class @ X650)=>((![X996:$i]:(in @ X996 @ nat=>((n_ts @ (num @ X994) @ (den @ X995))=(n_pl @ (n_ts @ (num @ X995) @ (den @ X994)) @ X996)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true)=>(X1)=(X650))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', def_rt_moreis)). 12.25/12.49 thf(def_rt_lessis, axiom, (rt_lessis)=(^[X1:$i, X651:$i]:(((![X997:$i]:(in @ X997 @ frac=>((![X998:$i]:(in @ X998 @ frac=>(((in @ X997 @ (class @ X1)=>(((in @ X998 @ (class @ X651)=>((![X999:$i]:(in @ X999 @ nat=>((n_ts @ (num @ X998) @ (den @ X997))=(n_pl @ (n_ts @ (num @ X997) @ (den @ X998)) @ X999)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true)=>(X1)=(X651))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', def_rt_lessis)). 12.25/12.49 thf(def_ecect, axiom, (ecect)=(^[X1:$i, X98:$i > $i > $o]:e_in @ (power @ X1) @ (anec @ X1 @ X98)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_ecect)). 12.25/12.49 thf(def_e_in, axiom, (e_in)=(^[X1:$i, X2:$i > $o, X4:$i]:X4), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_e_in)). 12.25/12.49 thf(satz81c, axiom, all_of @ (^[X1:$i]:in @ X1 @ rat) @ (^[X1:$i]:all_of @ (^[X666:$i]:in @ X666 @ rat) @ (^[X667:$i]:(rt_moreis @ X1 @ X667=>d_not @ (rt_less @ X1 @ X667)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', satz81c)). 12.25/12.49 thf(satz81d, conjecture, all_of @ (^[X1:$i]:in @ X1 @ rat) @ (^[X1:$i]:all_of @ (^[X658:$i]:in @ X658 @ rat) @ (^[X659:$i]:(rt_lessis @ X1 @ X659=>d_not @ (rt_more @ X1 @ X659)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', satz81d)). 12.25/12.49 thf(def_class, axiom, (class)=(ecect @ frac @ n_eq), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', def_class)). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_38, axiom, (d_not)=(^[X36:$o]:(X36=>~$true)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_d_not, def_imp])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_39, axiom, (all_of)=(^[X3:$i > $o, X2:$i > $o]:![X4:$i]:(X3 @ X4=>X2 @ X4)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_all_of, def_is_of])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_40, axiom, (non)=(^[X1:$i, X2:$i > $o, X4:$i]:(X2 @ X4=>~$true)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_non, c_0_38])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_41, axiom, (l_some)=(^[X1:$i, X2:$i > $o]:(![X821:$i]:(in @ X821 @ X1=>(X2 @ X821=>~$true))=>~$true)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_l_some, c_0_39]), c_0_38]), c_0_40])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_42, axiom, (n_is)=(^[X897:$i, X898:$i]:(X897)=(X898)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_n_is, def_e_is])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_43, axiom, (ecp)=(^[X1:$i, X93:$i > $i > $o, X4:$i, X10:$i]:(X4)=(ecelt @ X1 @ X93 @ X10)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_ecp, def_e_is])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_44, axiom, (l_ec)=(^[X38:$o, X39:$o]:(X38=>(X39=>~$true))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_l_ec, def_imp]), c_0_38])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_45, axiom, (n_some)=(^[X899:$i > $o]:(![X900:$i]:(in @ X900 @ nat=>(X899 @ X900=>~$true))=>~$true)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_n_some, c_0_41])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_46, axiom, (diffprop)=(^[X1:$i, X183:$i, X4:$i]:(X1)=(n_pl @ X183 @ X4)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_diffprop, c_0_42])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_47, axiom, (anec)=(^[X1:$i, X94:$i > $i > $o, X4:$i]:(![X860:$i]:(in @ X860 @ X1=>((X4)=(ecelt @ X1 @ X94 @ X860)=>~$true))=>~$true)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_anec, c_0_41]), c_0_43])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_48, plain, ![X7169:$i, X1:$i, X95:$i > $i > $o]:(epred13_3 @ X95 @ X1 @ X7169<=>~(![X7170:$i]:(in @ X7170 @ X1=>(X7169)!=(ecelt @ X1 @ X95 @ X7170)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[introduced(definition)])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_49, axiom, (d_and)=(^[X40:$o, X41:$o]:((X40=>(X41=>~$true))=>~$true)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_d_and, c_0_38]), c_0_44])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_50, axiom, (d_29_ii)=(^[X1:$i, X184:$i]:(![X921:$i]:(in @ X921 @ nat=>((X1)=(n_pl @ X184 @ X921)=>~$true))=>~$true)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_d_29_ii, c_0_45]), c_0_46])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_51, axiom, (iii)=(^[X1:$i, X185:$i]:(![X924:$i]:(in @ X924 @ nat=>((X185)=(n_pl @ X1 @ X924)=>~$true))=>~$true)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_iii, c_0_45]), c_0_46])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_52, plain, ![X1:$i, X2:$i > $o]:in @ (d_Sep @ X1 @ X2) @ (power @ X1), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[setof_p, def_is_of])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_53, plain, ![X1:$i, X95:$i > $i > $o]:(ect @ X1 @ X95)=(d_Sep @ (power @ X1) @ (epred13_3 @ X95 @ X1)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_ect, c_0_47])]), c_0_48])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_54, axiom, (and3)=(^[X51:$o, X52:$o, X53:$o]:((X51=>(((X52=>(X53=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_and3, c_0_49])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_55, axiom, (moref)=(^[X1:$i, X219:$i]:(![X948:$i]:(in @ X948 @ nat=>((n_ts @ (num @ X1) @ (den @ X219))=(n_pl @ (n_ts @ (num @ X219) @ (den @ X1)) @ X948)=>~$true))=>~$true)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_moref, c_0_50])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_56, axiom, (inf)=(in), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_inf, def_esti])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_57, axiom, (lessf)=(^[X1:$i, X220:$i]:(![X949:$i]:(in @ X949 @ nat=>((n_ts @ (num @ X220) @ (den @ X1))=(n_pl @ (n_ts @ (num @ X1) @ (den @ X220)) @ X949)=>~$true))=>~$true)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_lessf, c_0_51])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_58, plain, ![X7510:$i, X7511:$i > $o]:in @ (d_Sep @ X7510 @ X7511) @ (power @ X7510), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_52])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_59, plain, ![X7291:$i, X7292:$i > $i > $o]:(ect @ X7291 @ X7292)=(d_Sep @ (power @ X7291) @ (epred13_3 @ X7292 @ X7291)), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_53])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_60, axiom, (n_eq)=(^[X1:$i, X218:$i]:(n_ts @ (num @ X1) @ (den @ X218))=(n_ts @ (num @ X218) @ (den @ X1))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_n_eq, c_0_42])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_61, plain, ![X218:$i, X1:$i]:(epred20_2 @ X1 @ X218<=>(n_ts @ (num @ X1) @ (den @ X218))=(n_ts @ (num @ X218) @ (den @ X1))), introduced(definition)). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_62, axiom, (l_or)=(^[X42:$o, X816:$o]:((X42=>~$true)=>X816)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_l_or, def_imp]), c_0_38])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_63, axiom, (rt_is)=(^[X952:$i, X953:$i]:(X952)=(X953)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_rt_is, def_e_is])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_64, axiom, (rt_more)=(^[X1:$i, X646:$i]:(![X975:$i]:(in @ X975 @ frac=>((![X979:$i]:(in @ X979 @ frac=>(((in @ X975 @ (class @ X1)=>(((in @ X979 @ (class @ X646)=>((![X980:$i]:(in @ X980 @ nat=>((n_ts @ (num @ X975) @ (den @ X979))=(n_pl @ (n_ts @ (num @ X979) @ (den @ X975)) @ X980)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_rt_more, c_0_41]), c_0_54]), c_0_55]), c_0_56])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_65, axiom, (rt_less)=(^[X1:$i, X648:$i]:(![X987:$i]:(in @ X987 @ frac=>((![X991:$i]:(in @ X991 @ frac=>(((in @ X987 @ (class @ X1)=>(((in @ X991 @ (class @ X648)=>((![X992:$i]:(in @ X992 @ nat=>((n_ts @ (num @ X991) @ (den @ X987))=(n_pl @ (n_ts @ (num @ X987) @ (den @ X991)) @ X992)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_rt_less, c_0_41]), c_0_54]), c_0_57]), c_0_56])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_66, plain, ![X1:$i, X146:$i]:(in @ X146 @ (power @ X1)=>![X1108:$i]:(in @ X1108 @ X146=>in @ X1108 @ X1)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[k_PowerE, def_d_Subq])])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_67, plain, ![X2:$i > $o, X1:$i]:in @ (d_Sep @ X1 @ X2) @ (power @ X1), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_58])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_68, plain, ![X20:$i > $i > $o, X1:$i]:(ect @ X1 @ X20)=(d_Sep @ (power @ X1) @ (epred13_3 @ X20 @ X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_59])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_69, plain, (rat)=(ect @ frac @ epred20_2), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_rat, c_0_60]), c_0_61])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_70, axiom, (rt_moreis)=(^[X1:$i, X650:$i]:(((![X994:$i]:(in @ X994 @ frac=>((![X995:$i]:(in @ X995 @ frac=>(((in @ X994 @ (class @ X1)=>(((in @ X995 @ (class @ X650)=>((![X996:$i]:(in @ X996 @ nat=>((n_ts @ (num @ X994) @ (den @ X995))=(n_pl @ (n_ts @ (num @ X995) @ (den @ X994)) @ X996)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true)=>(X1)=(X650))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_rt_moreis, c_0_62]), c_0_63]), c_0_64])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_71, axiom, (rt_lessis)=(^[X1:$i, X651:$i]:(((![X997:$i]:(in @ X997 @ frac=>((![X998:$i]:(in @ X998 @ frac=>(((in @ X997 @ (class @ X1)=>(((in @ X998 @ (class @ X651)=>((![X999:$i]:(in @ X999 @ nat=>((n_ts @ (num @ X998) @ (den @ X997))=(n_pl @ (n_ts @ (num @ X997) @ (den @ X998)) @ X999)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true)=>(X1)=(X651))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_rt_lessis, c_0_62]), c_0_63]), c_0_65])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_72, plain, ![X1:$i, X98:$i > $i > $o]:(ecect @ X1 @ X98)=(e_in @ (power @ X1) @ (epred13_3 @ X98 @ X1)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_ecect, c_0_47])]), c_0_48])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_73, plain, ![X1:$i, X2:$i > $o, X4:$i]:(e_in @ X1 @ X2 @ X4)=(X4), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_e_in])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_74, plain, ![X7438:$i, X7439:$i, X7440:$i]:(~in @ X7439 @ (power @ X7438)|(~in @ X7440 @ X7439|in @ X7440 @ X7438)), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_66])])])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_75, plain, ![X20:$i > $i > $o, X1:$i]:in @ (ect @ X1 @ X20) @ (power @ (power @ X1)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_67, c_0_68])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_76, plain, (rat)=(ect @ frac @ epred20_2), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_69])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_77, plain, ![X7113:$i]:(in @ X7113 @ rat=>![X7123:$i]:(in @ X7123 @ rat=>((![X7124:$i]:(in @ X7124 @ frac=>![X7125:$i]:(in @ X7125 @ frac=>(in @ X7124 @ (class @ X7113)=>(in @ X7125 @ (class @ X7123)=>![X7126:$i]:(in @ X7126 @ nat=>(n_ts @ (num @ X7124) @ (den @ X7125))!=(n_pl @ (n_ts @ (num @ X7125) @ (den @ X7124)) @ X7126))))))=>(X7113)=(X7123))=>![X7127:$i]:(in @ X7127 @ frac=>![X7128:$i]:(in @ X7128 @ frac=>(in @ X7127 @ (class @ X7113)=>(in @ X7128 @ (class @ X7123)=>![X7129:$i]:(in @ X7129 @ nat=>(n_ts @ (num @ X7128) @ (den @ X7127))!=(n_pl @ (n_ts @ (num @ X7127) @ (den @ X7128)) @ X7129))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[satz81c, c_0_39]), c_0_38]), c_0_65]), c_0_70])])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_78, negated_conjecture, ~(![X6938:$i]:(in @ X6938 @ rat=>![X6948:$i]:(in @ X6948 @ rat=>((![X6949:$i]:(in @ X6949 @ frac=>![X6950:$i]:(in @ X6950 @ frac=>(in @ X6949 @ (class @ X6938)=>(in @ X6950 @ (class @ X6948)=>![X6951:$i]:(in @ X6951 @ nat=>(n_ts @ (num @ X6950) @ (den @ X6949))!=(n_pl @ (n_ts @ (num @ X6949) @ (den @ X6950)) @ X6951))))))=>(X6938)=(X6948))=>![X6952:$i]:(in @ X6952 @ frac=>![X6953:$i]:(in @ X6953 @ frac=>(in @ X6952 @ (class @ X6938)=>(in @ X6953 @ (class @ X6948)=>![X6954:$i]:(in @ X6954 @ nat=>(n_ts @ (num @ X6952) @ (den @ X6953))!=(n_pl @ (n_ts @ (num @ X6953) @ (den @ X6952)) @ X6954)))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[satz81d]), c_0_39]), c_0_38]), c_0_64]), c_0_71])])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_79, plain, (class)=(ecect @ frac @ epred20_2), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_class, c_0_60]), c_0_61])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_80, plain, ![X7298:$i, X7299:$i > $i > $o]:(ecect @ X7298 @ X7299)=(e_in @ (power @ X7298) @ (epred13_3 @ X7299 @ X7298)), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_72])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_81, plain, ![X7254:$i, X7255:$i > $o, X7256:$i]:(e_in @ X7254 @ X7255 @ X7256)=(X7256), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_73])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_82, plain, ![X5:$i, X4:$i, X1:$i]:(in @ X5 @ X4|~in @ X1 @ (power @ X4)|~in @ X5 @ X1), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_74])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_83, plain, in @ rat @ (power @ (power @ frac)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_75, c_0_76])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_84, plain, ![X8615:$i, X8616:$i, X8617:$i, X8618:$i, X8619:$i, X8620:$i, X8621:$i, X8622:$i]:((~in @ X8617 @ frac|(~in @ X8618 @ frac|(~in @ X8617 @ (class @ X8615)|(~in @ X8618 @ (class @ X8616)|(~in @ X8619 @ nat|(n_ts @ (num @ X8617) @ (den @ X8618))!=(n_pl @ (n_ts @ (num @ X8618) @ (den @ X8617)) @ X8619)))))|(~in @ X8620 @ frac|(~in @ X8621 @ frac|(~in @ X8620 @ (class @ X8615)|(~in @ X8621 @ (class @ X8616)|(~in @ X8622 @ nat|(n_ts @ (num @ X8621) @ (den @ X8620))!=(n_pl @ (n_ts @ (num @ X8620) @ (den @ X8621)) @ X8622))))))|~in @ X8616 @ rat|~in @ X8615 @ rat)&((X8615)!=(X8616)|(~in @ X8620 @ frac|(~in @ X8621 @ frac|(~in @ X8620 @ (class @ X8615)|(~in @ X8621 @ (class @ X8616)|(~in @ X8622 @ nat|(n_ts @ (num @ X8621) @ (den @ X8620))!=(n_pl @ (n_ts @ (num @ X8620) @ (den @ X8621)) @ X8622))))))|~in @ X8616 @ rat|~in @ X8615 @ rat)), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_77])])])])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_85, negated_conjecture, (in @ esk222_0 @ rat&(in @ esk223_0 @ rat&(((in @ esk224_0 @ frac|(esk222_0)=(esk223_0))&((in @ esk225_0 @ frac|(esk222_0)=(esk223_0))&((in @ esk224_0 @ (class @ esk222_0)|(esk222_0)=(esk223_0))&((in @ esk225_0 @ (class @ esk223_0)|(esk222_0)=(esk223_0))&((in @ esk226_0 @ nat|(esk222_0)=(esk223_0))&((n_ts @ (num @ esk225_0) @ (den @ esk224_0))=(n_pl @ (n_ts @ (num @ esk224_0) @ (den @ esk225_0)) @ esk226_0)|(esk222_0)=(esk223_0)))))))&(in @ esk227_0 @ frac&(in @ esk228_0 @ frac&(in @ esk227_0 @ (class @ esk222_0)&(in @ esk228_0 @ (class @ esk223_0)&(in @ esk229_0 @ nat&(n_ts @ (num @ esk227_0) @ (den @ esk228_0))=(n_pl @ (n_ts @ (num @ esk228_0) @ (den @ esk227_0)) @ esk229_0))))))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_78])])])])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_86, plain, (class)=(ecect @ frac @ epred20_2), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_79])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_87, plain, ![X20:$i > $i > $o, X1:$i]:(ecect @ X1 @ X20)=(e_in @ (power @ X1) @ (epred13_3 @ X20 @ X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_80])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_88, plain, ![X1:$i, X2:$i > $o, X4:$i]:(e_in @ X1 @ X2 @ X4)=(X4), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_81])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_89, plain, ![X1:$i]:(in @ X1 @ (power @ frac)|~in @ X1 @ rat), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_82, c_0_83])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_90, plain, ![X1:$i, X4:$i, X8:$i, X7:$i, X12:$i, X10:$i, X6:$i, X5:$i]:(~in @ X1 @ frac|~in @ X4 @ frac|~in @ X1 @ (class @ X5)|~in @ X4 @ (class @ X6)|~in @ X7 @ nat|(n_ts @ (num @ X1) @ (den @ X4))!=(n_pl @ (n_ts @ (num @ X4) @ (den @ X1)) @ X7)|~in @ X8 @ frac|~in @ X10 @ frac|~in @ X8 @ (class @ X5)|~in @ X10 @ (class @ X6)|~in @ X12 @ nat|(n_ts @ (num @ X10) @ (den @ X8))!=(n_pl @ (n_ts @ (num @ X8) @ (den @ X10)) @ X12)|~in @ X6 @ rat|~in @ X5 @ rat), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_84])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_91, negated_conjecture, in @ esk227_0 @ (class @ esk222_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_85])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_92, negated_conjecture, in @ esk227_0 @ frac, inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_85])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_93, negated_conjecture, in @ esk222_0 @ rat, inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_85])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_94, plain, ![X1:$i]:(ecect @ frac @ epred20_2 @ X1)=(class @ X1), inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_86])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_95, plain, ![X1:$i, X20:$i > $i > $o, X4:$i]:(ecect @ X1 @ X20 @ X4)=(X4), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_87]), c_0_88])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_96, plain, ![X1:$i, X4:$i]:(in @ X1 @ frac|~in @ X4 @ rat|~in @ X1 @ X4), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_82, c_0_89])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_97, plain, ![X5:$i, X7:$i, X6:$i, X4:$i, X1:$i]:((X1)!=(X4)|~in @ X5 @ frac|~in @ X6 @ frac|~in @ X5 @ (class @ X1)|~in @ X6 @ (class @ X4)|~in @ X7 @ nat|(n_ts @ (num @ X6) @ (den @ X5))!=(n_pl @ (n_ts @ (num @ X5) @ (den @ X6)) @ X7)|~in @ X4 @ rat|~in @ X1 @ rat), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_84])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_98, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X4:$i, X5:$i, X8:$i, X7:$i, X6:$i]:((n_pl @ (n_ts @ (num @ X1) @ (den @ esk227_0)) @ X4)!=(n_ts @ (num @ esk227_0) @ (den @ X1))|(n_pl @ (n_ts @ (num @ X5) @ (den @ X6)) @ X7)!=(n_ts @ (num @ X6) @ (den @ X5))|~in @ X5 @ (class @ esk222_0)|~in @ X1 @ (class @ X8)|~in @ X6 @ (class @ X8)|~in @ X4 @ nat|~in @ X1 @ frac|~in @ X7 @ nat|~in @ X8 @ rat|~in @ X5 @ frac|~in @ X6 @ frac), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_90, c_0_91]), c_0_92]), c_0_93])])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_99, plain, ![X1:$i]:(class @ X1)=(X1), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_94, c_0_95])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_100, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:(in @ X1 @ frac|~in @ X1 @ esk222_0), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_96, c_0_93])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_101, plain, ![X1:$i, X5:$i, X4:$i, X6:$i]:((n_pl @ (n_ts @ (num @ X1) @ (den @ X4)) @ X5)!=(n_ts @ (num @ X4) @ (den @ X1))|~in @ X4 @ (class @ X6)|~in @ X1 @ (class @ X6)|~in @ X5 @ nat|~in @ X4 @ frac|~in @ X1 @ frac|~in @ X6 @ rat), inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_97])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_102, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X5:$i, X4:$i, X6:$i, X7:$i, X8:$i]:((n_pl @ (n_ts @ (num @ X1) @ (den @ esk227_0)) @ X4)!=(n_ts @ (num @ esk227_0) @ (den @ X1))|(n_pl @ (n_ts @ (num @ X5) @ (den @ X6)) @ X7)!=(n_ts @ (num @ X6) @ (den @ X5))|~in @ X5 @ esk222_0|~in @ X4 @ nat|~in @ X7 @ nat|~in @ X8 @ rat|~in @ X1 @ X8|~in @ X6 @ X8), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_98, c_0_99]), c_0_99]), c_0_99]), c_0_96]), c_0_100]), c_0_96])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_103, negated_conjecture, (n_ts @ (num @ esk227_0) @ (den @ esk228_0))=(n_pl @ (n_ts @ (num @ esk228_0) @ (den @ esk227_0)) @ esk229_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_85])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_104, negated_conjecture, in @ esk229_0 @ nat, inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_85])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_105, negated_conjecture, (in @ esk224_0 @ (class @ esk222_0)|(esk222_0)=(esk223_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_85])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_106, plain, ![X4:$i, X1:$i, X5:$i, X6:$i]:((n_pl @ (n_ts @ (num @ X1) @ (den @ X4)) @ X5)!=(n_ts @ (num @ X4) @ (den @ X1))|~in @ X5 @ nat|~in @ X6 @ rat|~in @ X4 @ X6|~in @ X1 @ X6), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_101, c_0_99]), c_0_99]), c_0_96]), c_0_96])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_107, negated_conjecture, in @ esk228_0 @ (class @ esk223_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_85])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_108, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X4:$i, X5:$i, X6:$i]:((n_pl @ (n_ts @ (num @ X1) @ (den @ X4)) @ X5)!=(n_ts @ (num @ X4) @ (den @ X1))|~in @ X1 @ esk222_0|~in @ X5 @ nat|~in @ X6 @ rat|~in @ esk228_0 @ X6|~in @ X4 @ X6), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_102, c_0_103]), c_0_104])])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_109, negated_conjecture, ((n_ts @ (num @ esk225_0) @ (den @ esk224_0))=(n_pl @ (n_ts @ (num @ esk224_0) @ (den @ esk225_0)) @ esk226_0)|(esk222_0)=(esk223_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_85])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_110, negated_conjecture, (in @ esk226_0 @ nat|(esk222_0)=(esk223_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_85])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_111, negated_conjecture, ((esk223_0)=(esk222_0)|in @ esk224_0 @ esk222_0), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_105, c_0_99])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_112, negated_conjecture, (in @ esk225_0 @ (class @ esk223_0)|(esk222_0)=(esk223_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_85])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_113, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:(~in @ X1 @ rat|~in @ esk227_0 @ X1|~in @ esk228_0 @ X1), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_106, c_0_103]), c_0_104])])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_114, negated_conjecture, in @ esk223_0 @ rat, inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_85])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_115, negated_conjecture, in @ esk228_0 @ esk223_0, inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_107, c_0_99])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_116, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:((esk223_0)=(esk222_0)|~in @ X1 @ rat|~in @ esk228_0 @ X1|~in @ esk225_0 @ X1), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_108, c_0_109]), c_0_110]), c_0_111])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_117, negated_conjecture, ((esk223_0)=(esk222_0)|in @ esk225_0 @ esk223_0), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_112, c_0_99])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_118, negated_conjecture, ~in @ esk227_0 @ esk223_0, inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_113, c_0_114]), c_0_115])])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_119, negated_conjecture, (esk223_0)=(esk222_0), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_116, c_0_114]), c_0_115])]), c_0_117])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_120, negated_conjecture, in @ esk227_0 @ esk222_0, inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_91, c_0_99])). 12.25/12.49 thf(c_0_121, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_118, c_0_119]), c_0_120])]), ['proof']). 12.25/12.49 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 12.25/12.49 # Proof object total steps : 122 12.25/12.49 # Proof object clause steps : 42 12.25/12.49 # Proof object formula steps : 80 12.25/12.49 # Proof object conjectures : 27 12.25/12.49 # Proof object clause conjectures : 24 12.25/12.49 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3 12.25/12.49 # Proof object initial clauses used : 20 12.25/12.49 # Proof object initial formulas used : 38 12.25/12.49 # Proof object generating inferences : 11 12.25/12.49 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 34 12.25/12.49 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative 12.25/12.49 # Parsed axioms : 694 12.25/12.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 12.25/12.49 # Initial clauses : 1256 12.25/12.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 260 12.25/12.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 996 12.25/12.49 # Processed clauses : 10893 12.25/12.49 # ...of these trivial : 205 12.25/12.49 # ...subsumed : 4882 12.25/12.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 5806 12.25/12.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 18301 12.25/12.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 12.25/12.49 # Backward-subsumed : 180 12.25/12.49 # Backward-rewritten : 782 12.25/12.49 # Generated clauses : 463065 12.25/12.49 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 439340 12.25/12.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 780 12.25/12.49 # Paramodulations : 413931 12.25/12.49 # Factorizations : 0 12.25/12.49 # NegExts : 365 12.25/12.49 # Equation resolutions : 18803 12.25/12.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 1 12.25/12.49 # Propositional check models : 0 12.25/12.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 12.25/12.49 # Propositional clauses : 0 12.25/12.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 12.25/12.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 12.25/12.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 12.25/12.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.863 12.25/12.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.303 12.25/12.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 12.25/12.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 12.25/12.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 12.25/12.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 4687 12.25/12.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 391 12.25/12.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 27 12.25/12.49 # Negative unit clauses : 341 12.25/12.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 3928 12.25/12.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 428398 12.25/12.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 2990896 12.25/12.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 12.25/12.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 1034 12.25/12.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 7650050 12.25/12.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 602080 12.25/12.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3698 12.25/12.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 571005 12.25/12.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 70 12.25/12.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 689 12.25/12.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 103 12.25/12.49 # Condensation attempts : 0 12.25/12.49 # Condensation successes : 0 12.25/12.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 25016189 12.25/12.52 12.25/12.52 # ------------------------------------------------- 12.25/12.52 # User time : 11.756 s 12.25/12.52 # System time : 0.366 s 12.25/12.52 # Total time : 12.122 s 12.25/12.52 # Maximum resident set size: 2996 pages 12.25/12.52 EOF